gre考试写作审题有什么方法

时间：2022-11-06 17:53:39 admin

　　gre考试写作审题有什么方法?今天学习大全网小编给大家带来gre考试写作审题有什么方法，希望能够帮助到大家，下面学习大全网小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

　　gre考试写作审题有什么方法?

　　1.巧妙审题。

　　gre写作审题主要侧重两个方面：一是要弄清文章的文体和格式。审题不清，会导致格式不规范，作文要求不合格，甚至会因为跑题偏题而失分。二是要对文章的细节进行筛选。把有用信息按一定顺序分小点列出来，然后过滤掉无用信息。

　　2.构思词句。

　　根据gre考试审题步骤所列出的内容要点，列出以下内容：可能要用到的关键词语(如动词、短语等);可能用到的句型;可能用到的语句间的连接词;按内容要点顺序和所列词语、句型写出单句，同时将这些内容串联成句。

　　3.组织文章框架。

　　此gre写作考试步骤主要的作用是使整篇文章既有“骨架”，又有“血肉”。需要注意以下两点：一是要注意全文的时态运用，保持一致性;二是要讲究布局谋篇。恰当的段落划分，前后语句的连贯，句型的选择，连接词的运用都是考生需要考虑的内容。

　　4.检查完善。

　　文章完成之后要通读文章，检查前后内容是否连贯，语言是否畅通，段落划分是否分明，句型及连接词的运用是否恰当，时态运用是否一致，标点符号是否规范等等，保证文章逻辑清晰顺畅。

　　GRE作文范文：多媒体教育

　　Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

　　GRE作文范文参考：

　　Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

　　To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

　　Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

　　In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.

　　To conclude，technological innovations are beneficial to learning in many ways，but when using these technologies，one should not forget the real purpose of learning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovations that are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance，innovation here serves as a double-edges sword，and its right use is dependent on the students and the teachers.

　　GRE作文范文：事物不会一成不变

　　Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

　　GRE作文范文参考：

　　Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

　　To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

　　However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

　　Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

　　To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.

　　GRE作文范文：如何避免偏激

　　Most people often look for similarities， even between very different things， and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead， a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

　　GRE作文范文参考：

　　In the age of accelerating changes， the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques， skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people， the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view， only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

　　Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new，we need to clarify its basic attributes， finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline， basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles， similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance， Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance， one

　　may not be able to find the similarities， or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet， they are both part of a house， something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of， how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more， looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself， but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example， if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read， one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

　　Definitely， mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity， a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation， we know that it is transparent， it consists of different chemical materials， it performs the function as to protect privacy， to preserve desirable temperature indoor， and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

　　In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model，the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together， later they are defined， discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar， if not utterly same， terms. Translated into daily life， starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

　　结尾：非常感谢大家阅读《gre考试写作审题有什么方法》，更多精彩内容等着大家，欢迎持续关注学习大全网「Xuexidaquan.Com」，一起成长！

gre考试写作审题有什么方法相关文章：